Wantage 1 v Cumnor 1 [Match Report]

Wantage is a market town in the Vale of the White Horse, Oxfordshire, England. The town is on Letcombe Brook, about 8 miles south-west of Abingdon, a similar distance west of Didcot and 14 miles south-west of Oxford. It is notable as the birthplace of King Alfred the Great in 849 and for having a pretty good Chess Club.

Happy St. Patrick's Day
Happy St. Patrick’s Day
Cumnor 1 had the honor of heading over to Wantage on Tuesday evening (St. Patrick’s Day) for a match. Earlier in the season Cumnor won the reverse fixture, in a match which will be talked about for many years to come, the match report can be found here. This time would the luck of the Irish rub off on us or would we be left looking for answers at the bottom of a pint of Guinness?

Before I start, special thanks go out to David, Steve and Richard who came into the team after a couple of our regulars couldn’t make it, as well as Andrew and Mark who moved up the boards.

Steve was the first to finish on the night, a very early draw which was accomplished by forcing Nicolas in to repeating moves or losing. Mark won his game on board 3, with a lovely tactic which won a Knight and swapped off the remaining pieces into a clearly won endgame but Stephen resigned before it got to that point.

White has just played 42.Nxe7 there is no way Black can take either Knight safely, so Black will be at least a piece down
White has just played 42.Nxe7 there is no way Black can take either Knight safely, Black will also lose the d6 pawn
Andrew lost his game on board 2 leaving the match tried after 3 games 1.5 each. My game was the next to finish, which I won. We had reached an equal-ish position as the Rooks came off but I managed to activate my Knights. The position (right) shows the problematic situation Peter was in. David had a decent game but the rating difference took it’s toll and David lost. He did point out that if he had played that game for Cumnor 2 he would have won on time as they only play 75 minutes instead of the 90 played in division 2.

Well, not for the first time this season Richard was the last to finish and the result of the match was going to be decide on this game. Richard had reached a great position but didn’t have much time left. However, with a little work Richard finished George off and got the win for Cumnor. What makes this such an impressive result is that George is 36 Grading points higher than Richard. In fact Cumnor was out-graded (or equal too) on every board!

Wantage 1 v Cumnor 1

It was an remarkable result especially as we where down a number of first team regulars.

Cumnor 2 v Cowley 5 and Wantage 2 v Cumnor 2 [Match report]

It has been a tough week for Cumnor 2’s chess team as they took on both Cowley 5 and Wantage 2 in the space of five days.

Match night Cumnor 2 vs Cowley 5

They took on Cowley 5 last Thursday, it was a close game however Cowley 5 ran out 4-2 winners.

Cumnor 2 vs Cowley 5

Congratulations to Richard and Alan who both won their games. It was Alan’s first win for the team, but it was Richard’s game on board 1 that we can take a look at below.


Another closely fought match was played the following Tuesday at Wantage vs their 2nd team. Richard won his second game along with Steve, and Robert picked up half a point on board 5 against Ray Cordon.

Nevertheless, Wantage won on the other three boards and won the match 3.5-2.5.

Wantage 2 v Cumnor 2

Cumnor 1 v Wantage 1 [Match Report]

Firstly, please accept my apologies for the late delivery of this match report.

I was unable to publish the result due to an issue which will soon become clear.

But let’s start at the beginning. On Thursday 20th November Cumnor 1 took on Wantage 1. This early in the chess season both teams wanted the points to get off to a good start.

Cumnor 1 Wantage 1
1 Terrington, Simon (173) 1-0 Piggott, Roly (149)
2 Stevens, Gareth (147) 0.5-0.5 Ashford, Martin E (134)
3 Glenn, Liam (147) 0.5-0.5 Langham, Rod E (137)
4 Varney, Zoe (149) 1-0 Spalding, George H (129)
5 Sayers, Mark (139) 0.5-0.5 Richards, Simon A (124)
6 Varney, Daniel (137) 1-0 Cordon, Ray (85)
Match played on 20 Nov 2014. 4.5-1.5

Gareth was the first to finish this time with a draw on board two – the position was blocked with neither player able to make any real progress, a draw was offered and accepted.

Daniel picked up a piece and then a win against Ray who was playing his second game against Cumnor in as many weeks.

Mark had also recently played against Wantage (albeit Wantage’s second team), being part of the successful Cumnor 2 team that won its match on 13 November. Mark managed to get the same result this time for his game – a draw.

Zoe had a great position and as George Spalding said after the match “She was as strong an opponent as I have had all season, all her pieces seemed to always be on good squares – the sign of a good player – and I got hardly any play.”

Meanwhile, on board 1, Simon managed to win his game.

It was my game (Liam) on board 3 which was the most engaging.

The game went though a few phases before it got to the critical position.

At first I thought I had an advantage then I knew I had an advantage and finally I thought I was going to lose! The explanation into what happened next is taken from my version of events which had to be put in front of an arbiter.

The arbiter determined the game was a draw, which I believe is the right result.

Here are my notes on what happened:

“This is the position with White (Rod) to play, he had 90 seconds on his clock while Black (Liam) had under a minute.

Board position

White played b8... White pushed the pawn to the eight rank and hit his clock. I understand that this is an illegal move. White should have replaced the pawn with the promoted piece before hitting his clock therefore he did not complete his move. However, I did not say anything, as my clock was ticking and after I take the piece (whatever it is) we have reached a drawn position.

So I took the pawn/piece with my rook (...Rxb8) and offered a draw.

Board position

I could see that this was a drawn position and I had about 30 seconds on my clock, White had about 85 seconds left. Whatever White does I can win the a-pawn within the next few moves and potentially swap off Rooks to result in a final draw.

White’s next move completely stunned everyone, he picked up my Rook and replaced it with a Black(!) Knight (I am not sure how to notate that) and hit the clock.

Board position

Now my clock was running and I sat there for a few seconds trying to work out how the Black Knight got there. I then asked him what made him play that (thinking I was just being an idiot under time pressure and had miscalculated).

A discussion ensued while my clock was still ticking down, which it shouldn’t have been as White yet again hadn’t made a legal move. This action caused confusion, and was a clear interference of play at such a critical time of the match.

After a few more seconds I asked for the clocks to be stopped while I still had time left, I had about 6 seconds left at this point and by the time the clock were paused I had run out of time. Black then claimed a win because my clock fell seconds after the game was halted, saying he had done nothing wrong”

The result places Cumnor 1 into the middle of the table for division 2, with two wins and two losses out of the four games.

The updated table for division 2 can be found here here.

The Great Chess Dispute!

Black knightLast night, the Cumnor 1 team played at home against Wantage 1.

Sadly the match ended on a sour note, and a dispute on the final game to finish needs to be assessed by an independent referee.

Nevertheless, I am happy to say that whatever the referee’s decision, Cumnor won the game by at least 3.5-1.5.

A full match report will be posted once everything is finalised.

Cumnor 2 v Wantage 2 and Witney 5 [Match Reports]

The last week saw mixed results for Cumnor 2.

Last Thursday Cumnor 2 took on Wantage 2 at home. We came out victorious with a 4.5-1.5 scoreline in our favour.

Cumnor 2 Wantage 2
1 Sayers, Mark (139) 0.5-0.5 Ashford, Martin E (134)
2 Carr, Robin (124) 1-0 Booker, Julian (115)
3 Alvarez, Francisco (115) 1-0 Barker, Richard (91)
4 Ives, Marc (97) 1-0 Thompson, Steven (91)
5 Slade, Richard (-) 1-0 Cordon, Ray (85)
6 Steel, Robert (85) 0-1 Mahon, Paul (79)
Match played on 13 Nov 2014. 4.5-1.5

Richard’s game against Ray Cordon was interesting to watch. Although Richard clearly made some blunders, he managed to snatch victory from the jaws of defeat after Ray failed to keep an eye on his clock.

Here are Richard’s notes on the game:

A youthful team (well minus Steve!) took on Witney 5 the following Monday evening, a close match developed however this time Cumnor 2 lost 3.5-2.5.

Witney 5 Cumnor 2
1 Blackwell, David (123) 0.5-0.5 Bennett, Steven (110)
2 Tyne, Stewart (-) 0-1 Ives, Marc (97)
3 Dobrynin, Maxim (72) 0-1 Sterrie, David (78)
4 Read, William (54) 1-0 Ives, Leonora (72)
5 Beneat, Freddie (-) 1-0 Bennett Anton, Susana (44)
6 Soanes, Joshua (36) 1-0 Ives, Frida ()
Match played on 17 Nov 2014. 3.5-2.5

It was Cumnor 2’s first lost of the season, and the team currently sits in second place in the fourth division table, with Cowley 4 ahead of us on game point difference and above City 4 (Abingdon Sch), who are in third.

Cumnor 2 plays both of those teams in December which looks to be a tough month!

Cumnor 1 v Wantage 1 [Match Report]

Cumnor 1 made it three wins in a row on Thursday night vs Wantage 1.

Cumnor 1 Wantage 1
1 Stevens, Gareth (149) 0 – 1 Bush, Martin L (158)
2 Varney, Andrew (146) ½ – ½ Piggott, Roly (147)
3 Terrington, Simon () ½ – ½ Hemmings, Peter (143)
4 Glenn, Liam (140) 1 – 0 Ashford, Martin E (131)
5 Varney, Daniel (133) 1 – 0 Richards, Simon A (127)
6 Sayers, Mark (134) 1 – 0 Cordon, Ray (103)
Match played: 06 Jan 2014 3.5-2.5

The first game to finish was Liam’s, he quickly gained a better position playing against his favourite opening (the Caro-Kann) and eventually won a knight. Simon playing with the Caro-Kann as black, gained a draw against Peter Hemmings. Daniel also picked up another win to make it 2.5-0.5 to Cumnor 1. The remaining games created a tense atmosphere. Andrew lost under time pressure but Mark managed to win the endgame against Ray Corden putting us 3.5-1.5 up and winning the match. Gareth had a massive time advantage against his opponent in a complicated position but Martin Bush had just enough time to win, he had 1 minute 12 seconds left when Gareth resigned.

Wantage 1 vs Cumnor 1 [Match Report]

When Cumnor 1 last pitted itself against Wantage 1 in a chess match, we pulled off an unexpected victory.

So, it was with fingers crossed for a repeat performance that the Cumnor 1 team again made the journey to Wantage 1 for an away game.

Well, we always knew it was going to be an uphill struggle against a strong Wantage team, with their players outgunning ours with higher grades on every board – and, sadly, that’s borne out by the result.

Wantage 1 Cumnor 1
1 Bush, Martin L (158) 1 – 0 Stevens, Gareth (149)
2 Hemmings, Peter (143) 0 – 1 Glenn, Liam (140)
3 Langham, Rod E (142) 1 – 0 Sayers, Mark (134)
4 Morris, Stephen A (141) 1 – 0 Varney, Daniel (133)
5 Brown, Gordon D (140) 1 – 0 Alvarez, Francisco (114)
6 Spalding, George H (131) 0 – 1 Cluley, Graham (113)
Match played: 8 Oct 2013 4 – 2

Liam Glenn (140) started well as Black, and gained a past pawn on d3 early on in the middle game. However, his opponent quickly countered and he lost an exchange – Bishop for Rook. Later analysis revealed that this wasn’t as bad as first imagined, and Liam managed to gain a better pawn structure that allowed him to queen his extra pawn. Well done Liam!

A solid game was played by Mark Sayers (134), who gained a strong initiative in the middle game. Mark played a tactical sequence with a strong attack on his opponent’s King, but missed an opportunity to gain a winning position. Unfortunately, he fell behind on time and this eventually proved to be his downfall as there was just five minutes left as the game entered the end game.

Pako Alvarez (114) “fought like a lion”, but sadly it wasn’t enough on this occasion. Despite winning an extra pawn with his Queen’s Gambit opening, the situation changed rapidly and Pako found himself under permanent attack. Pako felt forced to exchange his king’s rook for his opponent’s knight. After that, his Wantage opponent mopped up the board by exchanging pieces and winning material.

George Spalding vs Graham Cluley. Black to moveMost chuffed of the Cumnor players on the night was Graham Cluley (113), on board six, who claims he played an opening he’d never tried in a match before – the Dutch Stonewall.

Almost certainly rapidly leaving the normal book line, Graham managed to pin his opponent’s knight and increase pressure against his opponent’s king side. However, the noose wasn’t tight enough, and white was able to swap his Queen for a black rook and bishop. This proved to be a sensible exchange for White, who had mating chances.

Ultimately, however, the combination of Graham’s Queen versus white’s knight and rook proved too powerful, allowing him to mop up white’s pawns, push his own and force a win.

Thanks to everyone who played.

Wantage 1 vs Cumnor 1 [Match Report]

The Cumnor 1 chess team caused an upset on Tuesday night, managing to beat Wantage 1.

Wantage 1 Cumnor 1
1 Walden, Andrew (204) ½ – ½ Varney, Andrew (143)
2 Bush, Martin L (149) 1 – 0 Sayers, Mark (141)
3 Brown, Gordon D (148) 0 – 1 Glenn, Liam (129)
4 Piggott, Roly (143) ½ – ½ Jones, Michael (117)
5 Richards, Simon A (141) 0 – 1 Varney, Daniel (111)
6 Spalding, George H (136) ½ – ½ Bennett, Steven (108)
Match played: 23 Apr 2013 2½ – 3½

With some of Cumnor 1’s players unavailable to play because of vacations, Wantage might have been expecting a less than challenging match. How mistaken they were!

Liam Glenn (129) was the first to finish his game, somehow managing to get a win after his opponent weakened his kingside attempting an attack. Liam managed to deflect the attack and gained enough material to force his opponent to resign.

Junior player Daniel Varney (111), who was playing his first ever game in Division 2, and his second game in two consecutive evenings for Cumnor, won against Simon Richards (141) with a very quick Smith-Morra kingside attack.

Steve Bennett (108) and Mike Jones (117) both drew against, again, much stronger players with both playing with black.

Andrew Varney (143) secured the win for Cumnor, with a draw against a player rated a mighty 204! Understandably, Andrew feels pretty good about that!

Mark Sayers (141) was the last Cumnor player to finish. Mark played a very long game, and with only seconds left on his clock found himself in a Knight vs Bishop endgame. Unfortunately, Mark had the knight.

Cumnor 1 can feel very proud of their performance against Wantage, outranked as we were on every board by the opponents’ grades.

Nice work chaps!

Cumnor 2 vs Wantage 2 [Match Report]

Back in December, a team of six brave Cumnor 2 chess players visited Wantage – seizing victory 4-2 on Wantage 2’s home turf.

Last night, it was time for the rematch, and Wantage 2 visited Cumnor Chess Club to play the Cumnor 2 squad.

Cumnor 2 Wantage 2
1 Glenn, Liam (129) 0 – 1 Hemmings, Peter (132)
2 Jones, Michael (117) ½ – ½ Booker, Julian (115)
3 Cluley, Graham (118) 1 – 0 Barker, Richard (113)
4 Bennett, Steven (108) 1 – 0 Cordon, Ray (104)
5 Steel, Robert (89) 0 – 1 Rey, Alvaro (88)
6 Harrop, Richard (56) ½ – ½ Hockaday, Derek ( )
Match played: 11 Apr 2013 3 – 3

Here’s how the different games went:

Liam Glenn (129), played Black on board one against the experienced Peter Hemmings (132), and appeared for most of the game to be in a stronger position. Unfortunately, as Liam seemed to be pressing home his advantage, he overlooked something which had appeared insignificant, and the tide rapidly turned. Well-considered play by White resulted in a win for Wantage, and put an end to a series of excellent match results for Liam.

Michael Jones (117), on board two, feels he’s had a bad run recently, and approached the chessboard with a certain degree of trepidation.

Playing as White, Mike played a fairly closed game, hoping his opponent would get bored and make a silly mistake. Mike’s experienced opponent didn’t fall into the trap, however, and Mike’s attempts to get his bishop behind enemy lines and force a mating position were rebuffed.

Realising that the game had reached an impasse, Black offered a draw which Mike gladly accepted.

Although claiming he couldn’t remember the last time someone played the Ruy Lopez against him, Graham Cluley (118) played confidently as Black, and managed to pin down most of his opponent’s major pieces, tying them in the tightest of knots.

White critically weakened his defences by advancing the pawns in front of his King, perhaps to attempt some counterplay, but the killer blow was a dramatic Bishop sacrifice by Graham after which there was no doubt as to the outcome. A win for Cumnor 2!

On board four, Cumnor 2 captain Steve Bennett (110) played strongly with an English opening, and gained a piece over his opponent. Careful, methodical play ultimately resulted in another win for Cumnor 2.

Meanwhile, on board five, Robert Steel (89) lost his match. However, I didn’t see any of it – so I can’t possibly explain what happened! Robert, if you want to fill in the gaps, please feel free!

Richard Harrop (56), on board six, spent most of the game a pawn done. He managed to rectify this in the endgame, but due to two opposite-squared bishops the game ended in a draw due to “repetitive check syndrome”!

Cumnor 2 vs Wantage 2 result:
3 – 3

Cumnor 2’s next chess match is an away game against Witney 4, on Monday 22 April.